Play Live Radio
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
0:00 0:00
Available On Air Stations

To Improve Graduation Rates, State BOE May Change Requirements

Andy Chow
/
Ohio Public Radio

High schools around the state are facing a crucial dilemma as about a third of students are not on track to graduate. That’s based on the new graduation standards that begin with the class of 2018. Leaders are scrambling to find a way to remedy the approaching crisis.  Ohio Public Radio's Andy Chow explains.

When you walk through the first floor hallway of the Ohio Department of Education building, it looks like any other office building.

 

Open the door to the conference room and it looks like any meeting happening around capitol square

 

But this isn’t your typical monthly meeting of the State Board of Education. This time, the futures of thousands of students are potentially on the line, as board members debate what to do with Ohio’s high school graduation requirements.

 

“Equip them with what they need to succeed.”

 

In that room, at a circle of tables speaking to more than a dozen board members, State School Superintendent Paolo DeMaria mulls over what it means to provide a good education before presenting the board with two ways to help more high schoolers get their diploma.

 

The current requirements ask students to get a good score over the course of seven different final exams, accomplish a credited work study, or score well on the SAT or ACT. These more challenging new standards were developed just three years ago.

 

Many school leaders, from teachers to administrators, say the state has an impending crisis on their hands. As of right now, more than 47,000 high school juniors are not on track to graduate under those standards that go into effect starting with the class of 2018.

 

“There is a certain urgency to making progress because, as was stated very well by superintendents and others who testified before this board, it’s important to give clarity to students who are about to finish their junior year and proceed into their senior year about what the expectations are.”

 

So here’s what DeMaria would like to see. Take the current standards when it comes to testing. But then offer eight other conditions for graduation and students would have to accomplish two of them.

 

Those conditions include, attending 93% of their classes senior year, getting a 2.5 GPA, or completing an independent senior project.

 

Republican Senator Peggy Lehner of Kettering is chair of the Senate Education Committee. She’s been following the looming graduation crisis closely and says these recommendations are an improvement.“A student who’s in their seat 93% of the time is going to be learning and I think that’s the sort of thing we want to reflect.”

 

She says it’s important to have high standards so a high school diploma still means something, but softening them for the class of 2018 is only fair.

 

“I think it certainly helps with the transition period there are just things that take time to adjust to -- a new test -- so we don’t want to artificially leave kids out of getting a diploma so I think it’s a very reasonable solution.”

 

Shuffling through a stack of papers just outside of the conference room is Chad Aldis, who’s preparing to speak against the new recommendations.

 

“What they appear to be recommending is essentially a diploma for students for just showing up.”

 

Aldis is with the pro-charter school group the Fordham Institute, which analyzes and researches academic achievement. He argues that offering conditions based on attendance and independent projects takes away from scoring students based on aptitude.

 

“No academic requirements? No proficiency in math, language arts, social studies for graduating from high school and I think that will remove some of the incentive to try to get students to a higher bar, to get them to perform better, and try to prepare them for what comes after high school.”

 

Back inside the conference room, most of the state board of education seems to disagree with Aldis’ take. They voted to move the new requirements on to the next step.

 

The board still needs approval from Ohio lawmakers in order to officially make those changes - which means the fates of many high schoolers in the state will move out of this conference room and over to the Statehouse for a new round of meetings to begin.

 

 

The Statehouse News Bureau was founded in 1980 to provide educational, comprehensive coverage of legislation, elections, issues and other activities surrounding the Statehouse to Ohio's public radio and television stations. To this day, the Bureau remains the only broadcast outlet dedicated to in-depth coverage of state government news and topics of statewide interest. The Bureau is funded througheTech Ohio, and is managed by ideastream. The reporters at the Bureau follow the concerns of the citizens and voters of Ohio, as well as the actions of the Governor, the Ohio General Assembly, the Ohio Supreme Court, and other elected officials. We strive to cover statehouse news, government issues, Ohio politics, and concerns of business, culture and the arts with balance and fairness, and work to present diverse voices and points of view from the Statehouse and throughout Ohio. The three award-winning journalists at the bureau have more than 60 combined years of radio and television experience. They can be heard on National Public Radio and are regular contributors to Morning Edition, All Things Considered and Marketplace. Every weekday, the Statehouse News Bureau produces in-depth news reports forOhio's public radio stations. Those stories are also available on this website, either on the front page or in our archives. Weekly, the Statehouse News Bureau produces a television show from our studios in the Statehouse. The State of Ohio is an unique blend of news, interviews, talk and analysis, and is broadcast on Ohio's public television stations. The Statehouse News Bureau also produces special programming throughout the year, including the Governor's annual State of the State address to the Ohio General Assembly and a five-part year-end review.
Related Content