Most Active Stories
- Ohio Plays Role In History Following SCOTUS Decision On Same-Sex Marriage
- Ballot Board Approves Cannabis Control Amendment For 2016 Ballot
- Possible Anti-Monopoly Ballot Issue Could Trump Pot Vote
- Locals Working To Preserve Original Port Columbus Terminal
- Body Found Is One Of Missing Southern Ohio Women
Mon June 2, 2014
Memorial Unveiling Caps Long Journey From Conception To Reality
Today’s Holocaust Memorial unveiling at the Ohio Statehouse marks the end of a three year saga from conception to creation. As Statehouse correspondent Andy Chow reports, that story includes some controversy and the resignation of a top Statehouse official.
Kasich: "We need to have remembrance in this Statehouse.”
That was Gov. John Kasich three years ago during the annual Holocaust Commemoration. He stressed that Ohio needed some type of memorial to pay tribute to the victims and liberators.
Kasich: “That members of our Legislature and members of the public as they pass through this great rotunda will be able to understand not just the history of the times when people wouldn’t stand but the fact that it’s today that we must stand against evil.”
Those comments set the memorial project in motion. The Capitol Square board which runs the Statehouse created a panel to select a memorial site and artist. However, the board’s chair, former Republican Senate President Richard Finan, strongly opposed the project.
Finan didn’t believe the Statehouse was the appropriate site for a Holocaust memorial and claimed the governor’s involvement intruded the intended independence of the Capitol Square board.
Finan: “What the governor should have done was come to the board to apply for a memorial and then the memorial would go through a process within the board and be approved or not be approved. He didn’t do that.”
Tensions escalated after Finan asked a Statehouse crew to construct a mock-up of the memorial—and an 18-foot structure… made up of pipes… tarps… and rope… stood on the south lawn.
Finan eventually resigned soon after casting the only “no” vote on the Holocaust Memorial plans.
Other groups suggested that the memorial, which includes two tablets displaying the Star of David in the middle, could threaten First Amendment rights. Joe Sommer is an Ohio board member of the Freedom from Religion Foundation who testified against the structure.
Sommer: “We’re concerned that the prominent display of the Star of David—which is a sacred symbol of the Jewish religion—constitutes an endorsement of a specific and therefore would violate the First Amendment.”
Joyce Garver Keller, executive director of Ohio Jewish Communities says the star does not promote any certain religion and stresses the importance of the memorial standing on public grounds.
Garver Keller: “Yes it’s appropriate for government because the Holocaust did not begin with smokestacks and ovens it began in the halls of government where legislation was passed that allowed the expulsion of Jews and others that the Nazis didn’t support.”
During the unveiling ceremony, Governor Kasich said he hopes the memorial reminds visitors to continue the fight against prejudice and recognize the evil that still exists.